defending mr.hyde

in the case of mr.Hyde i would defend him. because he is not all mr.Hyde he is dr.Jekyll as well  so that might  give him an advantage  so its like saying if mr.hyde goes to jail  then dr.Jekyll goes to jail as well. you cant realy defend him that well cause he still killed a man a member of parlement no less.

whitch charictor r u drawn 2 the most

well the charictor that im drawn to the most is Mr.hyde. because theres all these loose ends and it makes u courious to whats going to happen to him . well i think stevenson purposly decscribes hyde as a monster and i think he represents the "evil" in the theme of "good and evil"so ea thats why im drawn to Mr. hyde

story of the door responce

In Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde there were many moments that stood out. One of them was at the beginning (pg 3-4) when Hyde "camly trampled over the child's screaming body". well how do u "calmly trip"I think Mr Stevenson's word choice was a bit confusing it was like he was purposely describing Hyde like a monster. The second moment was at the bank the bank teller said the check was real even thought a different name was written on it   I thought  it was interesting that they thought Dr. Jekyll was being blackmail by Mr. Hyde. Mr. Utterson and Mr.Enfield did not realize that they could be same person or perhaps they did.  On page 7 Mr. Utterson says"I know it must seem strange.  The fact is, if I do not ask you the name of the other party, it is becuse I know it already."